日本語フィールド
著者：Moxon, Jonathan題名：Psychometric evaluation of abridged versions of the metacognitive awareness inventory in the Japanese population発表情報： 巻: Current Psychologyキーワード：metacognition
Metacognitive Awareness Inventory
confirmatory factor analysis概要：Metacognitive capacities are thought to be an important factor in academic achievement at all ages. One widely used measure is the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI: Schraw & Dennison, 1994), a 52-item self-report questionnaire. Several attempts have been made to verify underlying factor structure proposed by Schraw and Dennison without success. Harrison and Vallin (2018) used iterative factor analysis to arrive at a 19-item which loaded on to two factors—knowledge of cognition (KC) and regulation of cognition (RC)— and produced excellent fit with data obtained from a cohort of American under- graduates. This study attempted to replicate Harrison and Vallin’s results in a population of Japanese undergraduates. CFA of questionnaire responses from N = 192 participants indicated the model only approached minimum criteria for adequate or acceptable fit (SRMSR .060, RMSEA .052, TLI .886, CFI .899), suggesting that the model may not be applicable to respondents in different cultural contexts. Further, post-hoc inspection of standardized regression weights and analysis of item semantic content were carried out, arriving at exemplary fit for a 13-item KC-RC two-factor model (SRMSR .045, RMSEA .024, TLI .985, and CFI .998). The results obtained represent potentially productive avenues for future MAI research.抄録：英語フィールド
Author：Moxon, JonathanTitle：Psychometric evaluation of abridged versions of the metacognitive awareness inventory in the Japanese populationAnnouncement information: Vol: Current PsychologyKeyword：metacognition
Metacognitive Awareness Inventory
confirmatory factor analysisAn abstract：Metacognitive capacities are thought to be an important factor in academic achievement at all ages. One widely used measure is the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI: Schraw & Dennison, 1994), a 52-item self-report questionnaire. Several attempts have been made to verify underlying factor structure proposed by Schraw and Dennison without success. Harrison and Vallin (2018) used iterative factor analysis to arrive at a 19-item which loaded on to two factors—knowledge of cognition (KC) and regulation of cognition (RC)— and produced excellent fit with data obtained from a cohort of American under- graduates. This study attempted to replicate Harrison and Vallin’s results in a population of Japanese undergraduates. CFA of questionnaire responses from N = 192 participants indicated the model only approached minimum criteria for adequate or acceptable fit (SRMSR .060, RMSEA .052, TLI .886, CFI .899), suggesting that the model may not be applicable to respondents in different cultural contexts. Further, post-hoc inspection of standardized regression weights and analysis of item semantic content were carried out, arriving at exemplary fit for a 13-item KC-RC two-factor model (SRMSR .045, RMSEA .024, TLI .985, and CFI .998). The results obtained represent potentially productive avenues for future MAI research.