MF研究者総覧

教員活動データベース

The Effects of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation on Trunk Acceleration During Walking in Patients with Subacute Stroke

発表形態:
原著論文
主要業績:
主要業績
単著・共著:
共著
発表年月:
2021年04月
DOI:
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105635
会議属性:
指定なし
査読:
有り
リンク情報:

日本語フィールド

著者:
Tsubasa Mitsutake, Maiko Sakamoto, Hisato Nakazono, Etsuo Horikawa
題名:
The Effects of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation on Trunk Acceleration During Walking in Patients with Subacute Stroke
発表情報:
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 巻: 30 号: 4 ページ: 105635
キーワード:
Autocorrelation coefficient; Combination; Functional electrical stimulation; Subacute stroke; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Trunk acceleration
概要:
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether the combination of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and gait training with FES affected walking speed and trunk accelerometry-based gait characteristics in patients with subacute stroke, compared with FES or tDCS gait training only. Materials and methods: Stroke patients (n = 34; female 15; mean age, 72.5 ± 11.2 years; mean days poststroke, 38.7) with resultant paresis in the lower extremity (mean Fugl-Meyer score, 25.5) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: combined anodal tDCS and gait training with FES (tDCS+FES, n = 11), anodal tDCS with gait training (tDCS, n = 11), or combined sham tDCS and gait training with FES (FES, n = 12). Participants received the intervention for 20 minutes and a 40-minute conventional rehabilitative intervention daily for a week. Patients' walking ability was evaluated using walking speed, harmonic ratio (HR), autocorrelation coefficient (AC), and root mean square (RMS) along each axis using a wearable trunk accelerometer. Results: The tDCS+FES group had a significantly greater change in AC in the anteroposterior axis and mediolateral axis than the FES and tDCS groups and FES group, respectively. There were no significant effects on walking speed or other parameters (HR and RMS) among the groups. Conclusions: The combination of anodal tDCS and gait training with FES improved the post-stroke patients' gait regularity than FES gait training intervention only. Thus, combined tDCS and FES gait training, as a novel intervention, could be an important therapeutic tool in improving walking performance.
抄録:

英語フィールド

Author:
Tsubasa Mitsutake, Maiko Sakamoto, Hisato Nakazono, Etsuo Horikawa
Title:
The Effects of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation on Trunk Acceleration During Walking in Patients with Subacute Stroke
Announcement information:
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Vol: 30 Issue: 4 Page: 105635
Keyword:
Autocorrelation coefficient; Combination; Functional electrical stimulation; Subacute stroke; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Trunk acceleration
An abstract:
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether the combination of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and gait training with FES affected walking speed and trunk accelerometry-based gait characteristics in patients with subacute stroke, compared with FES or tDCS gait training only. Materials and methods: Stroke patients (n = 34; female 15; mean age, 72.5 ± 11.2 years; mean days poststroke, 38.7) with resultant paresis in the lower extremity (mean Fugl-Meyer score, 25.5) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: combined anodal tDCS and gait training with FES (tDCS+FES, n = 11), anodal tDCS with gait training (tDCS, n = 11), or combined sham tDCS and gait training with FES (FES, n = 12). Participants received the intervention for 20 minutes and a 40-minute conventional rehabilitative intervention daily for a week. Patients' walking ability was evaluated using walking speed, harmonic ratio (HR), autocorrelation coefficient (AC), and root mean square (RMS) along each axis using a wearable trunk accelerometer. Results: The tDCS+FES group had a significantly greater change in AC in the anteroposterior axis and mediolateral axis than the FES and tDCS groups and FES group, respectively. There were no significant effects on walking speed or other parameters (HR and RMS) among the groups. Conclusions: The combination of anodal tDCS and gait training with FES improved the post-stroke patients' gait regularity than FES gait training intervention only. Thus, combined tDCS and FES gait training, as a novel intervention, could be an important therapeutic tool in improving walking performance.


Copyright © MEDIA FUSION Co.,Ltd. All rights reserved.