日本語フィールド
著者：Tsubasa Mitsutake, Maiko Sakamoto, Etsuo Horikawa題名：Comparing activated brain regions between noisy and conventional galvanic vestibular stimulation using functional magnetic resonance imaging 発表情報：Neuroreport 巻: 32 号: 7 ページ: 583-587キーワード：概要：Objective: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) enhances vestibular sensory inputs in vestibular afferents. However, it is unclear whether noisy and conventional GVS activate different regions of the brain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in activated brain regions between those two interventions using functional MRI (fMRI).
Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to the noisy GVS or conventional GVS groups. Brain activity was measured during stimulation and compared with that during resting fMRI. This study used a blocked design comprising four task-rest blocks, each consisting of a 30-s period of vestibular stimulation followed by a 30-s period of rest. We evaluated the differences in contrast images between the noisy and conventional GVS groups.
Results: The noisy GVS group showed significantly increased activation in the vestibular system-related brain regions, including the insula and central operculum. The conventional GVS group showed significant activity in multisensory areas, including the supramarginal gyrus, central operculum and opercular part of the inferior frontal gyrus. Thus, the noisy GVS group showed significantly increased activity in the insula, putamen and central operculum compared with the conventional GVS group.
Conclusions: Noisy GVS could increase brain activity in the insular peripheral region compared to conventional GVS. Our results extend the literature about the importance of the stochastic resonance of noise addition for the vestibular system.抄録：英語フィールド
Author：Tsubasa Mitsutake, Maiko Sakamoto, Etsuo HorikawaTitle：Comparing activated brain regions between noisy and conventional galvanic vestibular stimulation using functional magnetic resonance imaging Announcement information:Neuroreport Vol: 32 Issue: 7 Page: 583-587An abstract：Objective: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) enhances vestibular sensory inputs in vestibular afferents. However, it is unclear whether noisy and conventional GVS activate different regions of the brain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in activated brain regions between those two interventions using functional MRI (fMRI).
Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to the noisy GVS or conventional GVS groups. Brain activity was measured during stimulation and compared with that during resting fMRI. This study used a blocked design comprising four task-rest blocks, each consisting of a 30-s period of vestibular stimulation followed by a 30-s period of rest. We evaluated the differences in contrast images between the noisy and conventional GVS groups.
Results: The noisy GVS group showed significantly increased activation in the vestibular system-related brain regions, including the insula and central operculum. The conventional GVS group showed significant activity in multisensory areas, including the supramarginal gyrus, central operculum and opercular part of the inferior frontal gyrus. Thus, the noisy GVS group showed significantly increased activity in the insula, putamen and central operculum compared with the conventional GVS group.
Conclusions: Noisy GVS could increase brain activity in the insular peripheral region compared to conventional GVS. Our results extend the literature about the importance of the stochastic resonance of noise addition for the vestibular system.